Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02139
Original file (BC 2014 02139.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02139

					COUNSEL:  NONE

		HEARING DESIRED:  NO 



APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded 
to honorable.


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was a young airman with financial issues and allowed 
immaturity to cloud his judgment.  Since being separated, he has 
been a model citizen, employed by the same company for 22 years.  
He would like to advance within the company but the 
characterization of his discharge may keep him from advancing. 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 
21 Jul 83.

On 27 Aug 90, the applicant’s commander recommended his 
discharge for Misconduct – pattern dishonorable failure to pay 
just debts, under the provisions of AFR 39-10, Administrative 
Separation of Airmen, para 5-47.  The reasons for the action 
included financial irresponsibility and failure to pay debts, 
for which he received several letters of counseling, letters of 
reprimand and an Article 15 dated, 8 Aug 90.

On 30 Aug 90, the applicant waived his board entitlement 
conditioned upon receipt of a General Discharge.

On 6 Sep 90, the discharge authority accepted the applicant’s 
conditional waiver and concurred with the commander’s 
recommendation to furnish the applicant a general (under 
honorable conditions) discharge.

On 13 Sep 90, the applicant was so discharged and was credited 
with 7 years, 1 month, and 23 days of active service.
On 10 Jul 14, a request for post-service information was 
forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 
30 days.  As of this date, no response has been received by this 
office (Exhibit C).


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or 
injustice that occurred in the discharge processing.  Based on 
the available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was 
consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge 
regulation and within the commander's discretionary authority.  
The applicant has provided no evidence which would lead us to 
believe the characterization of the service was contrary to the 
provisions of the governing regulation, unduly harsh, or 
disproportionate to the offenses committed.  In the interest of 
justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on 
clemency; however, in the absence of any evidence related to the 
applicant’s post-service activities, there is no way for us to 
determine if the applicant’s accomplishments since leaving the 
service are sufficiently meritorious to overcome the misconduct 
for which he was discharged.  Therefore, in the absence of 
evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting 
the relief sought. 


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-02139 in Executive Session on 29 Jan 15, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	
The following documentary evidence pertaining AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-02139 was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 10 May 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 Jul 14.

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01355

    Original file (BC 2014 01355.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01355 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. Furthermore, we do not find clemency is appropriate in this case since the applicant has not provided any evidence concerning his post-service activities. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03982

    Original file (BC 2014 03982.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 27 Feb 95, the applicant applied to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) to have his discharge upgraded to Honorable. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C). THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00192

    Original file (BC 2014 00192.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00192 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His debt of 27 months of unpaid SBP premiums be removed/waived from his retired military pay records. His SBP premium payments should start 1 Jul 13, the date the AFBCMR ruling directed his military records be corrected to show he had elected SBP coverage while on active duty. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03910

    Original file (BC 2014 03910.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board should find it in the interest of justice to consider his untimely application because the reason he waited so long to submit his application is because he was ashamed. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03563

    Original file (BC 2014 03563.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He requested an administrative discharge board and representation by military counsel. On 23 Sep 87, the discharge authority accepted the applicant’s conditional waiver and ordered the applicant be discharged with a general discharge without probation and rehabilitation. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 2 Oct 14, w/atch.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03524

    Original file (BC 2014 03524.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System (DEERS) records show the applicant requested spouse and child SBP coverage based on full retired pay prior to his 1 Nov 06 retirement. It is unfortunate that the applicant failed to notify DFAS in a timely manner of his marriage, in order to preclude a debt or to deny SBP coverage for her. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In a letter dated 5 Mar 15, he states his spouse provided a letter relinquishing the SBP benefit.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02187

    Original file (BC 2014 02187.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02187 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, with a period of service ending 30 Sep 05, be corrected to include active duty time served from 21 Sep 90 to 3 Jul 91. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03466

    Original file (BC 2014 03466.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03466 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Under Other Than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to at least general under honorable conditions. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03297

    Original file (BC 2014 03297.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03297 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge be upgraded to Honorable. On 13 May 97, the applicant received a Letter of Reprimand for disobeying a direct order and making a false official statement a violation of Article 91 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. The commander recommended her service be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00854

    Original file (BC-2012-00854.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS c. Three Letter of Debt Complaints/Dishonored Check DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00854 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge be upgraded to Honorable. Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the applicant’s General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge for...